Nick
Thank you so kindly for your replies but I am a bit lost as they appear to contradict each other.
The first reply states "General rule
(2) A person is a member of the family unit of another person (the family head) if the person:
(a) is a spouse or de facto partner of the family head; or . . ."
The ex-wife is not a spouse or de facto partner so my belief is that she does not qualify.
.Your second response says "A person will be a MoFU of another person (the family head) if the person:
is a child or step child of the family head.
If the 47a applicant is the child of your ex-wife, then your ex-wife is part of the child's family unit. "
The sponsor is the father who is not married to the ex-wife so the ex can not be part of the family unit I believe.
Let's step back and consider this ... A man can not petition for his ex-wife to move to Australia since there is no fertile grounds for such a request.
Would that mean, hypothetically, if ZaZa Gabor wanted to petition a daughter to Australia if Gabor was an Aussie, that she would have to include all 10 of her ex-husbands on 47A?
The ex is not a member of the sponsor's (eg family head) family unit.
We are mixing the sponsors family unit with the childs family unit so which one counts.?
Bottom line, does the ex have to be put on form 47 A, and if not do you just put N/A on the form?
Thank you so much. I look forward to hearing your input.