New IELTS rules dubbed "unfair"

Go Back   Living and Working in Australia Forum With Immigration and Travel Information > Living in Australia > Visas and immigration

Visas and immigration The Australia Forum for visas, immigration and migration to Australia. Please use this section to discuss all your immigration and moving to Australia needs. Discuss visa types, time lines, submission dates, police checks and read our members' immigration success stories here.

New IELTS rules dubbed "unfair"


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2013, 12:57 AM
Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 27
Users Flag! From australia

New IELTS rules dubbed "unfair"

Any applicant who has not taken the IELTS test in the three years prior to lodging a 457 visa application must have their application refused, unless they can qualify for some form of exemption.

If this is the case, the DIAC may have to refuse huge numbers of 457 visa applications, unless they decide to ignore their own regulations.

Again, such regulations have been described as "incredibly unfair, draconian and punitive". Applicant feels these new rules will especially impact those currently on bridging visas, who may now find themselves caught in a sort of Limbo between withdrawal and a s48 bar.

This concludes that most of these 457 applicants probably could demonstrate that they possess "sufficient English language ability" on the IELTS test, but the DIAC seems to have decided to implement this new rule in an "unreasonable" way and hasn't offered any transitional arrangements.


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2013, 05:16 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 277
Users Flag! From cambodia

45 likes received
6 likes given
Quote:
Originally Posted by manjeet View Post
Any applicant who has not taken the IELTS test in the three years prior to lodging a 457 visa application must have their application refused, unless they can qualify for some form of exemption.
If this is the case, the DIAC may have to refuse huge numbers of 457 visa applications, unless they decide to ignore their own regulations.
Again, such regulations have been described as "incredibly unfair, draconian and punitive". Applicant feels these new rules will especially impact those currently on bridging visas, who may now find themselves caught in a sort of Limbo between withdrawal and a s48 bar.
This concludes that most of these 457 applicants probably could demonstrate that they possess "sufficient English language ability" on the IELTS test, but the DIAC seems to have decided to implement this new rule in an "unreasonable" way and hasn't offered any transitional arrangements.
Hi Manjeet,
The exact situation for 457 visa applicants is still changing....

But, there are some simple changes that have happened:
1/
Strengthening the English language requirements by removing exemptions for applicants from non-English speaking backgrounds who are nominated with a salary less than $92,000 and requiring applicants who were exempt from the English language requirement when changing employers.
2/
There should be no adverse effects on existing visa holders if they are already doing the right thing.
It was easier to get PR than it was to get a 457 visa.
This changed last year, when the English level required for PR became much higher.

Now, an IELTS score of 6.0 is required for PR, whereas a 457 visa requires IELTS 5.0.

The 457 visa is a temporary visa, intended for filling short to medium term skill shortages, in a quick, flexible way to meet business needs.

These changes are necessary to reduce exploitation of 457 visa workers.

Hard - but fair in the long term....

__________________


From the Kingdom of Cambodia to Australia.......

  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2013, 11:01 AM
Active Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 27
Users Flag! From australia

Yes Robboat you are rite,

But this is unfair for those who have already lodge their application before 1 july 2013. they are still under the changed rules.

but this is unfair for migration agent too who advised to their client on first step of their application " No need of the IELTS in 457 if you want to Lodge your file as a manager".
May be client will keep this image in their mind, Migration was lying to make money.

at this step, Its very hard for them to convenience their client that rules had changed, you need to follow new rules, Alot questions from their sides which a migration agent have no answer.


Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coming Soon: No More "Uninvited" Direct Applications for WA State Sponsorship MarkNortham Visas and immigration 0 06-19-2013 12:13 PM
Claimed "single" on entry Australia - Will my de-facto visa be invalid?? kthann Visas and immigration 8 10-07-2011 08:27 PM
What does "time of decision" really mean when submit IELTS Fred_Gavin Visas and immigration 3 03-23-2011 04:59 PM
Question re: "Living Together" requirement of DeFacto Visa Application eshadlow Visas and immigration 3 09-28-2010 12:21 AM
Urgent query:RSMS-857 Visa for "Restaurant Manager" but Assessed in "Hotel Manager" VIJ Visas and immigration 5 06-01-2010 11:23 PM

LEGAL NOTICE
By using this Website, you agree to abide by our Terms and Conditions (the "Terms"). This notice does not replace our Terms, which you must read in full as they contain important information. You must not post any defamatory, unlawful or undesirable content, or any content copied from a third party, on the Website. You must not copy material from the Website except in accordance with the Terms. This Website gives users an opportunity to share information only and is not intended to contain any advice which you should rely upon. It does not replace the need to take professional or other advice. We have no liability to you or any other person in respect of any content on this Website.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 AM.




Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
AustraliaForum.com