NSW State Sponsorship Halt 5th August - Page 2

Go Back   Living and Working in Australia Forum With Immigration and Travel Information > Living in Australia > Visas and immigration

Visas and immigration The Australia Forum for visas, immigration and migration to Australia. Please use this section to discuss all your immigration and moving to Australia needs. Discuss visa types, time lines, submission dates, police checks and read our members' immigration success stories here.

Like Tree10Likes

NSW State Sponsorship Halt 5th August - Page 2


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2013, 11:11 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 4
Users Flag! From india

Hi Mark,

Thanks a lot for your prompt response.Please keep me posted if at all any changes.I will be submitting the documents to DIAC in a week time.

Thanks
Vijesh


  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2013, 05:21 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 4
Users Flag! From india

Confusion with ACS for applying DIAC

Thanks Mark.

I have one other concern before submitting my DIAC application. I have +ve ACS assessment result for 4.8 years of experience. After this I worked for 5 months in another company which was not added in ACS. When I applied for EOI, they asked me for the assessment for the last company which was 5 months and I got it but with the new rule of deduction of 2 years of my initial experience (so my experience is coming up to 3 years) which affect me in applying for 190 Visa.

But in the mean time I got NSW approval and invitation for statesponsership. My consultant is saying I can go ahead with my first ACS result. Will DIAC be asking me for the ACS result for 5 whole years or can I claim it by submitting my documents. I am confused. Please suggest.


Regards,
Vijesh


  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2013, 11:21 PM
Active Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8
Users Flag! From india

4 likes given
Hi Vijesh,

I am very much new to this forum. I have got my ACS result and applied for states sponsership. I was going through your latest post and not clear with your statement regarding new rule which is " got it but with the new rule of deduction of 2 years of my initial experience".

Can you please help me understand this?

Thanks
Honey


Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2013, 12:30 AM
MarkNortham's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,747
Users Flag! From australia

1452 likes received
150 likes given
Send a message via Skype™ to MarkNortham
Hi Vijesh -

Sorry, but there's no way I can assist you without seeing all of your documents and knowing more about your case. The law is too complex, and there are too many details. If you'd like to book a consultation, I'd be happy to assist as that would give us the time and resources to look into the details of your case. My website link is in my signature - you can click on that to get to the site, then click the area for Professional Consultation if you'd like to get specific advice for your case.

Thanks,

Mark Northam


Quote:
Originally Posted by Vijesh View Post
Thanks Mark.

I have one other concern before submitting my DIAC application. I have +ve ACS assessment result for 4.8 years of experience. After this I worked for 5 months in another company which was not added in ACS. When I applied for EOI, they asked me for the assessment for the last company which was 5 months and I got it but with the new rule of deduction of 2 years of my initial experience (so my experience is coming up to 3 years) which affect me in applying for 190 Visa.

But in the mean time I got NSW approval and invitation for statesponsership. My consultant is saying I can go ahead with my first ACS result. Will DIAC be asking me for the ACS result for 5 whole years or can I claim it by submitting my documents. I am confused. Please suggest.


Regards,
Vijesh

CollegeGirl likes this.
__________________
Mark Northam
Immigration Lawyer and Registered Migration Agent

LLB, GradDipLaw, GradCertMigrLaw, BBA(Acctg) MARN 1175508
Northam Lawyers http://nlaw.com.au [email protected]
Co-Host, Coming 2 Oz live video show: https://www.facebook.com/groups/coming2oz/

  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2013, 02:42 AM
Active Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 21
Users Flag! From india

1 likes given
Hello Mark,

I am also similar situation like alok.. could you please let us know if DIAC is not accepting the pipelined application then NSW will redirect the applications to DIAC..otherwise we have to withdraw our EOI.. Please clear my doubts..


  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2013, 03:21 AM
MarkNortham's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,747
Users Flag! From australia

1452 likes received
150 likes given
Send a message via Skype™ to MarkNortham
Hi Jayantsit -

Wish I could help - DIAC has made no official announcement about this at all that I know of at this point, and has only written to the states, with the state info leaking out as we saw on the ACT and NSW sites.

ACT is offering refunds if you wish to withdraw your application for state sponsorship, NSW has not made it clear what their plan is. I would call NSW directly and ask them if you need to know quickly. Both of our agent associations are on top of this and are asking all of the same questions, but so far it's been a lot of questions and very few answers. Will post any new info here as I receive.

Best,

Mark Northam

__________________
Mark Northam
Immigration Lawyer and Registered Migration Agent

LLB, GradDipLaw, GradCertMigrLaw, BBA(Acctg) MARN 1175508
Northam Lawyers http://nlaw.com.au [email protected]
Co-Host, Coming 2 Oz live video show: https://www.facebook.com/groups/coming2oz/

  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2013, 04:48 AM
Active Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 21
Users Flag! From india

1 likes given
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkNortham View Post
Hi Jayantsit -

Wish I could help - DIAC has made no official announcement about this at all that I know of at this point, and has only written to the states, with the state info leaking out as we saw on the ACT and NSW sites.

ACT is offering refunds if you wish to withdraw your application for state sponsorship, NSW has not made it clear what their plan is. I would call NSW directly and ask them if you need to know quickly. Both of our agent associations are on top of this and are asking all of the same questions, but so far it's been a lot of questions and very few answers. Will post any new info here as I receive.

Best,

Mark Northam
Hello Mark,

Thanks for the reply...Mainly the problem is my docs received to NSW on AUG 05 2013 and DIAC implemented new rules on same day..So, i am bit worrying if DIAC accepted to process the applications whether NSW consider my application or not...As your experience what DIAC is going to do..whether they will accept the applications which are in pipeline otherwise they wont accept...if they wont accept then DIAC will take all this applications on pro-rata basics like 189 otherwise we have to withdraw EOI...

sorry if i am repeating same questions ... bit at present i am very tensed ... as i am planning for this past 1 year...finally all lapsed with single statement...


Last edited by jayantsit; 08-08-2013 at 04:53 AM.

  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2013, 05:01 AM
CollegeGirl's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 9,033
Users Flag! From usa

4424 likes received
6268 likes given
Jayantsit - Mark has already provided you with all the information he can at this point from what he's saying. This is a new policy (as far as I know) and not something that has happened before, so until migration agents are given more information there's nothing more to tell you yet.

__________________
Original Nationality: US
Visa #1: PMV (300) through Washington, D.C
Applied: April 2013.
Visa Granted: January 2014.
Visa #2: Subclass 820 (From PMV).
Applied: End of April 2014.
Visa Granted: Early July 2014.
Visa #3: 801 (PR)
Eligibility Date: End of April 2016 (Applied a month prior).
PR Granted: Early April 2017.

  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2013, 07:40 AM
MarkNortham's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,747
Users Flag! From australia

1452 likes received
150 likes given
Send a message via Skype™ to MarkNortham
Just received the following from our industry association, sent from DIAC.

In 2012-13, the six occupational groups referred to in your email reached their occupational ceilings which meant no intending migrants in these occupations could be nominated or invited to apply for a visa until the ceilings were reset on 1 July 2013. In the first month of the 2013-14 program year, a significant proportion of available places were again used up for these six occupational groups and it was determined that the ceilings would again be met, but even earlier than in the previous program year. Based on the high numbers of Expressions of Interest (EOIs) being submitted for these occupational groups, the decision was therefore made to move to a pro rata allocation of the remaining places to allow limited numbers of the most highly skilled workers in these occupations to apply for a visa throughout 2013-14.

There is no change in the total number of places available for these six occupational groups under their occupational ceilings. However, the allocation of places will be spread out to ensure that highly skilled migrants who submit EOIs later in the program year are not prevented from applying by lower quality applicants taking all available places earlier in the program year. Again, I would highlight that this change has no impact on the number of places available for these occupational groups but it will allow places to be released throughout 2013-14, with a focus on ensuring the most highly skilled migrants can still apply for a visa, instead of having all places exhausted early in the program year.

In the current program year, the percentage of places used up for these six occupational groups prior to the 5 August 2013 invitation round were as follows:
Occupation ANZSCO Code Total Ceiling Invitations & Nominations Remaining places
Percentage of places used Percentage of places remaining
Chemical & Material Engineers 2331 360 173 187 48.06% 51.94%
ICT Business & System Analysts 2611 1380 897 483 65.00% 35.00%
Electronics Engineers 2334 420 152 268 36.19% 63.81%
Telecomm Eng Prof 2633 300 106 194 35.33% 64.67%
Other Engineering Prof 2339 300 98 202 32.67% 67.33%
Software and Applications Programmers 2613 4800 1,168 3,632 24.33% 75.67%

Occupational ceilings will be reviewed as part of a general review of SkillSelect in 2013-14 and this will involve all key stakeholders, including the MIA and State and Territory governments. The department will be preparing a discussion paper for distribution to stakeholders and this will provide an opportunity to comment on how SkillSelect has operated to date and to identify areas for improvement in the future.
In relation to the specific issues you have raised in your email, please see the responses below:

1. We understand that the State and Territory Governments were advise that the following six occupations (or occupation groups)for GSM points tested visas (Subclass 190 and 489) can no longer be nominated:
• Chemical and Materials Engineers; [ANZSCO Group 2331]
• ICT Business and Systems Analysts; [ANZSCO Group 2611]
• Electronics Engineers: [ANZSCO Group 2334]
• Telecommunications Engineering Professionals; [ANZSCO Group 2633]
• Other Engineering Professional [ANZSCO Group 2339]
• Software and Applications Programmers. [ANZSCO Group 2613]

These six Unit Groups comprise 17 occupations, 16 or which are on the CSOL. Can we assume that those 16 occupations are all not able to be nominated by State and Territory Governments?

As noted above, the continuing high numbers of EOIs for these six occupational groups meant that the available places would have been fully exhausted well before the end of the program year if the decision to implement pro rata allocations had not been made. In some instances the available places would have been used up in Monday’s invitation round or the following round on 19 August. It was considered the most appropriate option to allow a limited number of the most highly skilled workers in these occupations to be invited to apply for a visa throughout the year, rather than allowing the ceilings to be met which would have prevented all skilled workers in these occupations from applying until the start of the next program year in July 2014.

Under these arrangements, the points score and date of EOI submission cut-off dates for these occupational groups are expected to increase over the course of the program year and these figures will be included in the regular SkillSelect invitation round report published on the department’s website. State and Territory Governments have been advised that if they have intending migrants for nomination in any of the six occupational groups who would have met the relevant cut-offs, they can refer these cases to the department for consideration of nomination on a case-by-case basis.

The intention of these changes is to ensure that the most highly skilled workers in these occupational groups are still eligible to apply for a visa. This will also avoid the situation of having a client being nominated or invited early in the program year at the expense of a more highly skilled intending migrant who cannot be nominated or invited later in the program year because the occupational ceiling has been reached. In this regard, SkillSelect is operating as intended to allow the best and brightest to apply for a visa, not on a first-in, first-served basis.

2. Does this “ban” on occupations apply to State/Territory nomination applications which have been approved by the State/Territory Governments, but which have not yet been issued with an invitation to apply for a visa?

Visa applicants who have in good faith lodged applications for State or Territory nomination and whose applications have either not been finalised, or whose applications have been finalised but have not yet had an invitation to apply for a visa issued, will have been treated most unfairly.

Registered Migration Agents who have advised and assisted applicants with State/Territory nominations will have been placed in the unreasonable and invidious position of being seen to have not given correct advice.

There is no ban on these occupations but as advised above, we have implemented a pro rata allocation for the remaining places under the existing occupational ceiling for these groups. If this action were not taken, the occupational ceilings would have been met for these groups well before the end of the program year. States and Territories are also able to refer cases for consideration where they have clients who would have met the relevant cut-offs based on points and date of EOI submission.
An application for a State or Territory nomination is not a visa application and clients are not able to apply for a visa until they have been nominated or invited to apply for a visa in SkillSelect. The clients referred to in the example above would also have been adversely affected if the relevant occupational ceiling had been reached since no one from the occupational group would be eligible for nomination or invitation until July 2014. Under the pro rata arrangements, the most highly skilled intending migrants from each occupational group will still be able to apply for a visa throughout the 2013-14 program year and as such, these arrangements can actually be seen as a positive development for clients, particularly those who do not submit EOIs until later in the program year.

3. Until today, when occupation ceilings were reached, they were no longer available for any GSM points based applications, not just State/Territory nominated applications.
Why has the decision been made to remove occupations from the State/Territory nominated Subclasses?

The MIA understands that State and Territory Governments have been advised that it is because there is a need to get “the best and the brightest”. This would assume that those obtaining State/Territory nomination are not the best and the brightest. Is that the case?

This decision would also seem to have the potential of causing great problems for some State and Territory Governments for whom the occupation groups are a significant component of their State Migration Plans. The decision could, in some cases, severely undermine those plans.

As noted above, State and Territory Governments can refer cases which would have met the relevant cut-offs for the six occupational groups for consideration of nomination on a case-by-case basis. This is consistent with the aims of ensuring the best and brightest intending migrants are nominated or invited to apply for a visa from SkillSelect, whether that be via the Skilled Independent or State or Territory nominated streams.

4. Why was there no consultation with important stakeholders on this matter?

It was necessary to take this action before the 5 August 2013 invitation round to ensure that the occupational ceilings were not reached in that round and given the time constraints, it was not possible to consult beforehand. To demonstrate the continuing high level of demand for the six occupational groups, the table below shows the number of current EOIs onhand compared to the number of available places under each occupational ceiling:

Occupation ID Description Total EOIs onhand Remaining places
2331 Chemical and Materials Engineers 113 179
2334 Electronics Engineers 178 256
2339 Other Engineering Professionals 214 193
2611 ICT Business and Systems Analysts 691 462
2613 Software and Applications Programmers 1546 3467
2633 Telecommunications Engineering Professionals 205 186

Three of the six occupations are already oversubscribed and the other three occupations are expected to do the same in the near future based on continuing high numbers of EOIs being submitted. In this context, it was necessary to take this action prior to consultation.
__________________
Mark Northam
Immigration Lawyer and Registered Migration Agent

LLB, GradDipLaw, GradCertMigrLaw, BBA(Acctg) MARN 1175508
Northam Lawyers http://nlaw.com.au [email protected]
Co-Host, Coming 2 Oz live video show: https://www.facebook.com/groups/coming2oz/

  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2013, 11:47 AM
Active Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 21
Users Flag! From india

1 likes given
Hello Mark, Thank you very much for the detailed information...its really helpful

Could you please explain the scenario regarding 55 points as i have applied to NSW. So, i am getting (55+5= 60 points) but now as it is going to pool .. how can we get state 5 points ... could you please clear this doubt...so it would be great...

Regards


Last edited by jayantsit; 08-09-2013 at 11:53 AM.

Closed Thread

Tags
190 skilled niminated visa, change in rules, diac, nsw skilled nomination, state sponsorship

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
State Sponsorship ! krispy182 Visas and immigration 0 07-17-2011 05:14 PM
state sponsorship panxiaoyan Visas and immigration 3 01-09-2011 10:35 PM
state sponsorship epsy Visas and immigration 1 07-05-2010 04:15 PM
State Sponsorship Kaijaz Visas and immigration 4 04-01-2010 09:14 AM
state sponsorship sgill Visas and immigration 2 02-01-2010 07:15 AM

LEGAL NOTICE
By using this Website, you agree to abide by our Terms and Conditions (the "Terms"). This notice does not replace our Terms, which you must read in full as they contain important information. You must not post any defamatory, unlawful or undesirable content, or any content copied from a third party, on the Website. You must not copy material from the Website except in accordance with the Terms. This Website gives users an opportunity to share information only and is not intended to contain any advice which you should rely upon. It does not replace the need to take professional or other advice. We have no liability to you or any other person in respect of any content on this Website.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 PM.




Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
AustraliaForum.com